<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Inzamam thinkgs appeal against him was not sporting</title>
	<link>http://www.cricketviewer.com/inzamam-thinkgs-appeal-against-him-was-not-sporting.html</link>
	<description>Covering Cricket in Pakistan and abroad</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 02:45:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: CricketViewer.com &#187; Inzamam in heat on his reaction to obs decision</title>
		<link>http://www.cricketviewer.com/inzamam-thinkgs-appeal-against-him-was-not-sporting.html#comment-8</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2006 09:06:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.cricketviewer.com/inzamam-thinkgs-appeal-against-him-was-not-sporting.html#comment-8</guid>
					<description>[...] Inzamam thinks that appeal against him was not sporting and the laws have not been defined clearly: &amp;#8220;Such not very common laws need to be explained properly and in detail.&amp;#8221; Is it not incumbent upon a player to know them himself? And if they need explaining to one with a 100-plus Tests and 350 ODIs, in a career spanning nearly 16 years, it reveals more about the player than the laws. That Inzamam should have known the law brooks no argument, defense or justification. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Inzamam thinks that appeal against him was not sporting and the laws have not been defined clearly: &#8220;Such not very common laws need to be explained properly and in detail.&#8221; Is it not incumbent upon a player to know them himself? And if they need explaining to one with a 100-plus Tests and 350 ODIs, in a career spanning nearly 16 years, it reveals more about the player than the laws. That Inzamam should have known the law brooks no argument, defense or justification. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
